Name: Kashmiri Nomad From: India About me: Born in Kashmir, raised and educated in Western Europe.
I presently live somewhere west of the Bosphorus and east of the Rocky Mountains.
As you can see to the right is an image of the front page of the British newspaper the Daily Express. The headline is forthright and quite upsetting if one does not like the thought of Sharia very much. Rather than give you my biased opinions on why the newspaper ran with such a story lets leave it to a British blogger at Little Bulldogs to vent some thoughts on the situation:
"Splashed across the front page of today's Daily Express is a story about Sharia courts in Britain. The express headline reads: "NOW MUSLIMS GET THEIR OWN LAWS IN BRITAIN". Quite obviously, the headline is intended to cause concern. Even the use of the word "Now" is, presumably, designed to imply that this is another step in a process. The question is, though, is there any merit to this story?
The article itself doesn't carry very much new information. It simply tells us that there are Sharia courts operating in the major cities of the UK. We already knew that. Back in November the BBC investigated the Sharia courts of Britain and found them to be little different to the Jewish courts that have operated in this country for decades. They are religious courts of arbitration. Their decisions are legally binding under the Arbitration Act 1996 (not sure what happened before then).
Clearly, so long as these courts are dealing merely with civil cases, and the two parties agree to be bound by the court's decision, there is nothing to discuss. However, should the courts be dealing with criminal cases then this is a different matter. The Express report makes no mention of any criminal cases being judged by these Sharia courts. Certainly, no new laws have been invented for Muslims as the headline implies.....
....There are real problems within the Muslim community, but inventing new ones to sell papers is to do a disservice to the entire country. Shame on them. (Source: Little Bulldogs)
I think that Little Bulldogs has summed it up perfectly at least for me anyway.
"Islam is satanic and Muslims are uncivilised savage barbarians".
For the sake of argument I completely agree with these two "objective" statements of fact concerning my religion and me . As a people we Muslims really do need to learn how to live like proper human beings. You see the problem is that as Muslims we are the missing link that Darwin's "Origin of the Species" eluded to when hypothesising about the evolution of ape into man. Therefore we have a hard time keeping to standards of normal human behaviour.
Keeping this in mind I thought that it would be nice for the Muslim readers of this weblog and there are a few to see how civil humans interact with others..
In the video that you are about to see we witness how noble American military personal who were sent to the Muslim world in order to civilise the native savages give the locals a lesson in civility, respect, humility and appreciation. Virtues that all Muslims are sadly lacking in copious amounts.
Much has been said and written about the integration or lack of it of Muslims into western societies. The reader may take his or her pick from the numerous analyses and commentaries that represent the whole of the current political discourse on the subject.
Representing the first extreme analysis we have those that believe Muslim migration to the west is intrinsically predicated on a sinister motive. A motive that wishes to see the complete and total destruction of western civilisation from within. This group of commentators views Muslims as a malignant non-human species and one that is hell bent on killing all non-Muslims and establishing the global Caliphate over the dead broken bodies of any who stand in their way.
The second extreme is represented by those who believe that Muslims have no obligation to try to fit into the socities to which they have made their homes. They believe that the host societies must bend backwards and try to accommodate very demand that the new Muslim citizens make upon them. For this group of commentators nothing is too much trouble in order to help the Muslims in the west.
The final group is the "moderate " group who I believe has the correct understanding of the issue of "Muslim integration" into western societies. This group rejects the extremism of both the first group and the second. It believes that Muslims living in a western country have a responsibility to learn and respect the language, culture and history of the country that they have their made home.
I wish to now move onto a template I think that can spread some light on how Muslims can successfully achieve the goals of integrating into western societies. The template that I am taking about is one that has already been used to good effect in the recent past and its consequences are still being felt in today's world. The template I am taking about is how western civilisation through mass migration to the "New World" integrated into the language, culture and history of the indigenous population of the Americas. The effects of this "integration" can still be felt in the world that we see around us today.
Western mass migration to the Americas was undoubtedly a very good thing if you were white and Christian but for the millions of indigenous peoples of the land the influx of western migrants spelt the end of a way of life that natives had known for generations.
Not for our civilised European mass migrants was there any thought given to the notion of integration. There was no thought given to the wishes of the original inhabitants of the land. In fact there is was no mass drive to demand and teach European migrants the language, culture and history of the peoples of North America. On the contrary the message that European migrants believed, taught and imposed by the Winchester rifle was one of racial and religious superiority. A message that was uncompromising and soaked in the blood of many native Americans.
This article is from the St. Louis Republic dated Wednesday, Dec. 17, 1890 and is entitled "The Last Of Sitting Bull". It reports on the incident that has now notoriously become known as the Massacre at Wounded Knee where 350 Sioux Indians including 44 women and girls and 18 babies were killed by the US 7th Cavalry. The reason why this account is reproduced here is because I believe it shows us today in no uncertain terms how Europeans/Western civilisation bent over backwards to integrate into Native American society:
"The death of Sitting Bull removes one of the obstacles to civilization. He was a greasy savage, who rarely bathed and was liable at any time to become infected with vermin. During the whole of his life he entertained the remarkable delusion that he was a free-born American with some rights in the country of his ancestors. Under this delusion, when civilized immigrants pushed over the Black Hills country in search of gold he considered them trespassers on the lands of his people and tried to keep them out. He was engaged in this absurd and wicked attempt when General Custer surprised his camp in the interests of civilization. Unfortunately for civilization General Custer was mistaken in the number of the savages who had assembled to fight for the land, which they foolishly believed was their birthright, and "a massacre" ensued. That is, it was one of those rare occasions when savagery for the moment had the best of it in a pitched battle with civilization. It was, of course, only for the moment, and Sitting Bull and his followers, who might have been easily and legally hanged as murderers, were granted a temporary respite.
This graciousness of the Great Father they have constantly abused by obstructing civilization in every possible way, especially in the worst way possible by trying to keep their land in a state of barbarism, and by insisting on their own understanding of treaties, regardless of necessary changes in translation into a highly civilized language, and of necessary amendments made in Congress. They have gone on holding ghost dances, complaining about the rations issued to them under treaties, objecting to the way their money was handled by the government, and it is charged on excellent civilized authority, actually stealing from civilized people who have settled on their lands.
Under such circumstances there could have been only one ending for Sitting Bull, and now that it has come he has no complaint to make. There is every reason to believe, therefore, that it was perfectly satisfactory to him. He himself had recognized it as inevitable and had fully made up his mind to it, preferring it to death in what in his barbaric way he called the "stone houses of the Great Father," meaning thereby the penitentiaries in which the Great Father, with the aid of Hon. Powell Clayton, Hon. Poker J. McClure and others of his Sanhedrin, attempts on occasion to incarcerate those who disagree with him in such a way as to inconvenience him.
So when Sitting Bull was surprised and overpowered by the agents of the Great Father, he set his greasy, stolid face into the expression it always took when he was most overcome by the delusion that he was born a native American from native American ancestry. Disarmed and defenceless he sat in the saddle in which he had been put as a preliminary to taking him to prison, and without a change of countenance urged his handful of greasy followers to die free. This idiotic proceeding he kept up until he was shot out of the saddle.
So died Sitting Bull. So was removed one of the last obstacles in the path of progress. He will now make excellent manure for the crops, which will grow over him when his reservation is civilized.
The work of redeeming these excellent lands from barbarism has now reached a point where it can be at once carried to completion. The filth and vermin-infested Sioux and other savages who have pretended a desire to live even under starvation rations and broken treaties will be persuaded by Sitting Bull's example, and a little skillful management of the same kind which converted him from a brutal savage into a good Indian, to stand up where they can be shot out of the way of advancing progress.
Mr. Harrison should continue to act with the same promptness and firmness he has shown in Sitting Bull's case. While one of these barbarians lives to claim an acre of unentered land in the United States he will remain as an obstacle to progress. A firm persistence by the President in the admirably progressive policy he has illustrated in Sitting Bulls case will make good Indians of all the rest of them, bucks, squaws and pappooses. And the future historian will say of them, no doubt, that they died justly, because they owned lands and would not use fine-toothed combs." (Source: Dick Shovel)
The emphasis is mine and not from the original article.
The point of this post is not to advocate that Muslims integrate into western societies as the Europeans integrated into native American societies. It is however to expose the hypocrisy of those who rant on about the integration of Muslim immigrants but all the while their country and civilisation is founded upon the murder of millions of innocent people whose only crime was not to be of the right race or religion or to be just plain greasy.
Dear reader it is that time of week again when we have a look at some of the interesting posts that can be found on weblogs in my blogroll. So without anymore ceremony here is the blog round up for 04/29/2007:
Pim's Ghost looks at the case of 3 evangelical Christians brutally murder in Turkey.
LFG Watch presents a comedy video from Australian television surrounding the issue of Muslims and profiling.
Dr. M has more pictures from his recent trip to Saudi Arabia.
Problogger explains how a young couple made half a million in an hour.
Craig Murray former British Ambassador links to a review of a play that is being shown in London and entitled "'The Indictment Of Anthony Charles Lynton Blair For The Crime Of Aggression Against Iraq - A Hearing".
Atlas Shrugs writes about the American owned Arab television channel Al-Hurra which was created to take on Islamofascist Al-Jazeera but has now ended up joining them by broadcasting terrorist propaganda.
Christine Benlafquih an American convert to Islam explores the U.S. citizens right to bear fire arms after the massacre at Virginia Tech.
IsraPundit challenges the decision of the National Union of Journalists in England to boycott Israeli goods.
Newshounds state that "Even Ann Coulter Is Fed Up With Bill O'Reilly's Rosie Obsession".
Haitham Sabbah presents a video detailing the every day life of Iraqi women.
Jenn of the Jungle exposes the effect that political decisions made by Democrats in America have on the situation on the ground in Iraq.
Majority Rights claims that all massacres committed in America by those born between the 1960's and 1970's were executed by immigrants.
Orthodox Anarchist explains what a keffiyeh ("rag" worn by Arab men in the Middle East upon their heads) is and it's political implications.
Hakawi links to an article entitled "America’s moral menopause" looking at American policies in the Middle East.
Aaron Russo is a Jewish American film producer, politician and businessman. He is famous for being Bette Midler's agent in the 1970's and producing films like The Rose, Trading Places and Wise Guys. More recently Mr. Russo has turned his hand to politics standing as a Republican candidate for the office of Governor in Nevada in the 1990's.
In 2006 Russo released his latest offering called America: From Freedom To Fascism. The documentary film explores issues surrounding the IRS and the Federal Reserve system of banking as well as many other issues.
The initial Allied invasion of Iraq in 2003 is now all but a distant memory. Since that time the Iraqi insurgency and sectarian warfare has accounted for the deaths of tens if not hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. However the actions of 3 American military personal are still making international headlines.
Sgt. Shawn Gibson, Capt. Philip Wolford and Lt. Col. Philip DeCamp during the intial invasion fired a tank shell at the Palestine Hotel in Baghdad. The hotel was well known as a place of sanctuary for foreign journalists. As a result of that tank shell being fired at the hotel Spanish cameraman Jose Couso was killed. An in house U.S. military investigation cleared the men of any wrong doing. But a Spanish judge has charged the 3 with homicide and issued an international arrest warrant for their arrests. In response the United States government has refused outright to extradite its personal:
"A (Spanish) judge indicted three U.S. soldiers Friday in the 2003 death of a Spanish journalist who was killed when their tank opened fire at a hotel in Baghdad.
Sgt. Shawn Gibson, Capt. Philip Wolford and Lt. Col. Philip DeCamp were charged with homicide in the death of Jose Couso and "a crime against the international community." This is defined under Spanish law as an indiscriminate or excessive attack against civilians during war....
...Couso, who worked as a cameraman for the Spanish TV network Telecinco, died on April 8, 2003, after a U.S. Army tank crew fired a shell at the Palestine Hotel, where many journalists were staying. Taras Portsyuk, a Ukrainian cameraman for Reuters, was also killed.
Following the incident, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell said the troops responded after drawing hostile fire from the hotel. He said a U.S. review of the incident found the use of force was justified.
According to the five-page indictment, DeCamp ordered the shot, and Wolford then authorized Gibson to carry it out.
"The people indicted knew and were aware that the Palestine Hotel was occupied by civilians, without there being a proved threat (sniper or otherwise) against themselves or the U.S troops, therefore, the tank shot that caused the death of Mr. Couso would constitute an attack, retaliation, or violence threat or act aimed at terrifying journalists," the indictment said.
Pedraz has issued several arrest warrants against the three, but the United States has made clear it will not hand them over.
The three men still run the risk of arrest under a Spanish-issued international warrant should they travel to any country that has an extradition treaty with Spain.
Under Spanish law, a crime committed against a Spaniard abroad can be prosecuted here if it is not investigated in the country where it was allegedly committed." (Source: WTOP News)
My opinion on this matter is quite straightforward. If one has nothing to hide then one has nothing to fear. Spain is not some third world Islamic banana republic being ruled by Islamofascists. If the United States military personal really did do every above board and dispensed their duties correctly then they should have no problems in defending themselves in a court of law against charges of murder. In the end no matter how long after the event the truth always seems to come.
The lack of official American support in helping European countries investigate precisely how their nationals were killed is a bit of a running soar in Europe. Cases such as this as well as the killing of British soldier Matty Hull and British journalist Terry Lloyd have all left a bit of a soar taste in most Europeans mouths.
In defence of the American position I am sure that they believe that these killings were committed in the fog of war and that all necessary steps were taken to avoid such tragedies. If this the case then there should be no problem in establishing the facts in an independent court of law so that the families of the killed are given some sort of acceptable closure.
Let me begin by saying that this post is in no way anti-Semitic and that in no way do I wish to deny that the German Christofascists did not murder 6 million Jews in the Holocaust.
A former Orthodox Chief Rabbi of Israel has had a complaint filed against him with the Israeli police over remarks he made concerning the Jewish Reform Movement.
Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu believes that it was the Reform movement's rebellion against God which caused the genocide of the Jewish people in Nazi Christian Germany:
"The executive director of Arza, the Reform Movement's Zionist arm, called on the Chief Rabbinate Tuesday to chastise Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu for blaming the Holocaust on Reform German Jews.
"Rabbi Eliyahu's outrageous statements point out just how out of touch he is with Jewish reality," said Rabbi Andrew Davids....."
""Anyone with the most basic understanding of German anti-Semitism would understand that there is no relationship between the piety and religiosity of Jews and the violence committed against them."
Davids was referring to statements made by Eliyahu, former chief Sephardi rabbi of Israel, during an interview on a pirate haredi radio station called "The Voice of Truth" [Kol Ha'emet].
Eliyahu, who was asked what was the sin of those murdered in the Holocaust, responded that they were not to blame. Rather, he said, they suffered because of the sins of the Reform Movement.
"The Reformers started in Germany," explained Eliyahu. "Those redactors of the Jewish faith began in Germany. We learn from this that it is forbidden to attempt to change Judaism."
Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, Mordechai's son, who is also the chief rabbi of Safed, said his father had no regrets about his comments.
"It is not a coincidence that the Holocaust began in Germany," said Shmuel Eliyahu Tuesday. "Whenever Jews try to act like goyim they are punished. It happened during the Spanish Inquisition and it happened during the Holocaust."
The Reform Movement in Israel filed a complaint against Eliyahu with the police. " (Source: Jerusalem Post)
We visit once again the topic of "Eurabia". If you read this weblog with any regularity you will already know the meaning of the term but for the benefit of any new readers I shall just summarise:
"Eurabia" was a term first coined by the Jewish Egyptian historian Bat Ye'or who was stripped of her Egyptian nationality and emigrated to Britain in the 1950's.
In the beginning "Eurabia" was used in the context of French ties to Muslim countries. The theory under pinning the idea of Eurabia was an "axis" of support that France wanted to establish with Muslim countries as a counter-weight to American supremacy. Over time "Eurabia" has come to have a wider meaning and is now a pejorative term used by some in the Middle East and the United States to define Europe as living in perpetual servitude to Islam and Muslims.
With the definition over lets move on to the "meat" of this post.
It appears that the "Eurabian" concept which implies that Muslims have emigrated to western countries in order to subjugate them and establish the global Caliphate has been dealt another blow with news from the United Kingdom that 2/3 of Muslims have contemplated emigrating rather than staying in Britain. In reality many have actually left while many more are intending to leave:
"At Nuzhat al-Sibassi's family home in south London, the contents are being packed away in boxes, ready to be shipped to the United Arab Emirates.
Mrs al-Sibassi was born in Britain to Pakistani parents, raised and educated here. She's worked as a senior hospital manager in the NHS, but is now moving with her family to the United Arab Emirates.
"Living here is not how it was. The politics and the environment has changed and people's perception of Muslims has changed dramatically. A number of incidents in UK over past 3-4 years have marred life for decent Muslims living here."
Last year an ICM survey found that two-thirds of Muslims contemplated leaving Britain after the 7 July bombings in London. The regular flow of front-page headlines has placed Muslims under intense pressure to explain their faith and its place in British society.
"Bringing up children in an environment where the messages in the media are anti-Islamic, it just puts added pressure on them as they grow up," Mrs al-Sibassi says.
It's a pressure she feels herself too. "You feel you are having to constantly prove that you're not what other people think you are. You always have to be on your guard." (Source: BBC News)
Other posts on the topic of Eurabia can be accessed by clicking on the following links:
The fine political construct that is the "Judeo-Christian tradition" is often used by modern day anti-Islam bigots as a way to describe the nature of the the clash between western civilisation and the barbarity of Islam.
The hypothesis that both Christianity and Judaism have shared some kind of mutual "love affair" through out their existence seeks to hide ugly historical realities. Unfortunately for the bigots the "Judeo-Christian" tradition is a well documented history. It is replete with accounts of murder, rape and pillage as Jews were killed, pillaged and expelled throughout European Christian history. A bloody history that culminated in the tragic events of the Nazi Holocaust where 6 million Jews were killed at the hands of "Christofascists" in Germany.
Benedict XVI joined the Hitler Youth in 1941and now as Pope he is planning changes to the Catholic Mass that are "concerning" to Jewry world wide:
"Pope Benedict's plans to revive the Latin Mass, which includes prayers for the conversion of Jews, is causing concern among Catholic and Jewish groups about relations between their faiths.
Religious commentators predict that Pope Benedict will issue authorisation for wider use of the Mass - known as the Tridentine Mass - soon.
The Mass was celebrated for hundreds of years before being replaced by a liturgy celebrated in local languages, as part of reforms instigated after the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s.
The old wording has none of the Vatican Council thinking that reversed long-standing anti-Jewish views in the Church. Vatican II brought about a revolution in Catholic thinking, highlighting the ancient Jewish roots of Christianity and affirming God's love for the Jews.
Concern is now focused on traditional mass's Good Friday liturgy which contains a prayer "For the conversion of the Jews". The prayer reads:
"Let us pray also for the Jews, that the Lord our God may take the veil from their hearts and that they also may acknowledge our Lord Jesus Christ."
It refers to their "blindness" and prays for them to be "delivered from their darkness." (Source BBC News)
The official response from Jewish representatives has been muted but I am sure that the spectre of anti-Semitism is not too far from their minds and this is no bad thing as European "Christofascists" have killed 6 million of their kind not so long ago.
"Rabbi David Rosen president of IJCIC, the International Jewish Committee that represents World Jewry in its relations with other world religions, says: "Any liturgy that presents Jews as being doomed in their faith doesn't present a very healthy attitude towards Judaism and the Jewish people." (Source: BBC News)
The reality of the shared Judeo-Christian tradition is a history of hate and is soaked in the blood of innocent victims. A true testament of man's inhumanity to his fellow man. The blood of the millions of innocents that were killed in this shared tradition is now being used by anti-Islam bigots as a ploy to gain political capital in their battle against Islam.
The Pew Research Center is an American organisation that studies the nation's views on politics, the press and public policy issues. This is how they describe themselves in their own words:
"The Center is an independent opinion research group that studies attitudes toward the press, politics and public policy issues. We are best known for regular national surveys that measure public attentiveness to major news stories, and for our polling that charts trends in values and fundamental political and social attitudes. Formerly, the Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press (1990-1995), we are now sponsored by The Pew Charitable Trusts and are one of six projects that make up the Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan "fact tank" that provides information on the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world." (Source: Pew Research Center)
The center on the 15 April 2007 released a survey entitled: "Public Knowledge of Current Affairs Little Changed by News and Information Revolutions". The survey analysed data from all sections of the American political spectrum comparing and contrasting results from similar surveys held over the last 20 odd years:
"Since the late 1980s, the emergence of 24-hour cable news as a dominant news source and the explosive growth of the internet have led to major changes in the American public's news habits. But a new nationwide survey finds that the coaxial and digital revolutions and attendant changes in news audience behaviors have had little impact on how much Americans know about national and international affairs.
On average, today's citizens are about as able to name their leaders, and are about as aware of major news events, as was the public nearly 20 years ago. The new survey includes nine questions that are either identical or roughly comparable to questions asked in the late 1980s and early 1990s. In 2007, somewhat fewer were able to name their governor, the vice president, and the president of Russia, but more respondents than in the earlier era gave correct answers to questions pertaining to national politics. "(Source:Pew Research Center) The full report and its findings can be accessed by clicking on the following link: Public Knowledge of Current Affairs Little Changed by News and Information Revolutions.
The survey contained a quiz that respondents were asked to complete. The analysis of those results are detailed below :
"To measure overall knowledge levels, a core group of 23 of the 26 questions was used to form a knowledge index. Each correct answer counted as one point, producing a scale that ranges from zero - no correct answers - to 23, a perfect score. Each respondent received a score based on the number of questions he or she answered correctly.1
Eight people out of the 1,502 respondents answered all 23 questions correctly. At the other end of the spectrum, five people failed to answer a single question correctly. The average respondent got about 12 of the 23 questions right, or slightly more than half. 10 percent answered 20 or more questions accurately - and 5% got more than 20 questions wrong or said they did not know the answer.
Using a common school grading scale in which 90% correct is the minimum necessary to receive an A, 80% for a B, 70% for a C, 60% for a D and less than 60% is a failing grade, Americans did not fare too well. Fully half would have failed, while only about one-in-six would have earned an A or B." (Source: Pew Research Center)
I took the online version of the test which can be accessed by clicking this: Pew Quiz
Here is my result:-
I scored 7 out of a possible maximum of 9. The website says that I did better on the quiz than 77% of the general American public. The two questions that I got wrong related to the Congress passing an increase on the minimum wage.
I think I did pretty well on the quiz considering I am a brainwashed, savage, brown skinned, illiterate, uncivilised, bearded, follower of Satan, follower of the Arab pagan moon-god, Islamofascist, Islamonazi, Nazi Sand Nigger, Muzzie, Mud slime, Hadji etc etc etc
This video is a sermon given by convicted Jewish terrorist Chaim Ben Pesach of the Jewish Task Force regarding the history and nature of Islam and Muslims.
A synopsis of Chaim Ben Pesach achievements is now provided in order that the reader may familiarise himself/herself with the lecturer:
"Chaim Ben Pesach was born on Tuesday, December 25, 1956. In 1971, at the age of 14, he joined the Jewish Defense League. He eventually became the JDL National Chairman in September 1978. He had to step down in December, 1978 after he went to jail for bombing Egyptian targets in an effort to stop the Israeli retreat from the Sinai Peninsula. After his release and upon the completion of his probation in July, 1983, he rejoined JDL. In 1984, he eventually became Chairman again and, in an effort to influence the USSR to allow Jewish emigration, in the 1980s, he bombed Soviet diplomatic targets in New York and tear-gassed a ballet performance at Lincoln Center that featured Soviet performers. He continued as JDL Chairman until his arrest in 1987. He pleaded guilty in connection with six bombings and was sentenced to 10 years but served five and a half before being released on probation. According to Chaim, while he was in jail, he became very thin because they wouldn't give him any kosher food until Republican Senator Jesse Helms intervened on his behalf. Upon his release in 1991, he started JTF.
Chaim is banned from entering Israel because of his support of the late Rabbi Meir Kahane's Kach Party, which has been outlawed in Israel. In 1996, he tried to emigrate to Israel, but was immediately detained at Ben-Gurion International Airport upon his arrival, and was placed in administrative detention in a cell in the airport. He was not allowed to speak to an attorney nor an American Embassy official, despite the fact that he is an American citizen. He was subsequently deported to the U.S., where he now lives in the New York metropolitan area.
Chaim is an Orthodox Jew. He is the son of an Ashkenazic Jewish father, Pesach Ben Dov, and an Egyptian Sefardic Jewish mother, Malkah Bat Meir. Chaim refers to this as knowing the best of both Jewish backgrounds. He also calls upon his Egyptian Jewish ancestry when he says that he of all people should know how Arab Muslims are. He has never been married. Chaim has brown hair and blue eyes and also strongly believes in eating only healthy food." (Source: Answers.Com)
It appears that this gentleman has been to prison twice for terrorism related offenses and now lectures the world about Islamic terrorism. The worlds pot, calling, kettle and black all come to mind.
This is another fine example of an American traitor laying into President Bush and his administration.
Donald Trump passes disparaging remarks about anyone he can think of from Mr. Rumsfeld to Mr. Cheney and most people in between in this CNN interview with Wolf Blitzer.
Trump should be tried for the high crime of treason, for even daring to question the current American administration. His comments can only be construed by right thinking civilised people as aiding and abetting the enemy at a time when western civilisation is fighting for its very existence against Islamofacist Nazi sand nigger barbarians.
Most certainly another example of the turkeys voting for Christmas do you not think ? Lord have mercy!
If the west cannot cannot civilise these savage woman and make them realise that Christ is their Lord and he died for their sins what hope do they have of ever becoming a part of the human race ?
The conventional received wisdom amongst American anti-Islam bigots is that Barack Obama the Democratic candidate for the American Presidency in 2008 is a closet Muslim or at the very least a Muslim lover. How far is this assertion true ? One can see how "Islamic" Obama is when he is "litmus tested" against the age old problem of the Israeli-Arab conflict.
My views on the Arab-Israeli conflict are well known as witnessed by my post "Muslims For A Greater Israel". I support an expansion of Israel's boarders so that the country covers the area from the Nile to the Euphrates. Keeping that to one side as a "closet" Muslim would not Obama try to weaken the Israeli state ? And in America itself would Obama have greater support amongst Muslims or Jews ? Lets read what the Jerusalem Post has to say about these questions relating to Barack Obama after his speech to the National Jewish Democratic Council :
"The United States government and an Obama presidency cannot ask Israel to take risks with respect to its security," he told the crowd of Democratic activists and campaign contributors.....
.....It's important to be "hard-headed and clear-eyed about the dangers" in the Middle East, Obama said.
"We also have to recognize that the status quo is not inevitable, that we can aspire to something greater," he continued, "we should want to have that difficult, tough discussion...about how we're going to arrive at what I think everybody wants, which is two states living side by side in peace and security."
The audience applauded his words, which came in response to a question on how firm his backing for Israel was in light of the support he has received throughout his career from the Muslim American community.
Obama said that the premise of the query was "false," as the support he's received from the Jewish community "has been far more significant than any support I've received in the Muslim American community..." (Jerusalem Post)
For me as a non-American and neutral observer of the election campaign it is absolutely "no skin off my nose" if Obama wins or not. What I find interesting is that many within America would use his alleged "ties" to Islam as a way to smear him. As if some how being connected to a Muslim is now akin to being from the illegitimately sired progeny of Lucifer himself. It seems that hatred towards Muslims is the underlying story to this American election campaign so far.
A British teenage girl drunk to the point of amnesia after a night out on the town hails a taxi to take her home. The taxi driver is a Muslim. The teenager reaches home and feels a pain in her groin. She says that the Muslim taxi driver raped her on the way home. With the information that is presently in front of you who would you say is the victim in this scenario ?
Lets take a look at the answer to see if you are right and also see the circumstances surrounding this incident from Britain:
"A FATHER-of-two was left "shattered" yesterday after a teenager who falsely accused him of rape was given just a four-month detention order.
Taxi driver Aftab Ahmed, 44, lost his house, livelihood and good name after the 17-year-old girl maintained her lies for more than a year.
His ordeal only came to an end when his tormentor finally admitted her guilt on the first day of her trial for perverting the course of justice.
Yesterday, the teenager, who still cannot be named for legal reasons despite her lies, was given a four-month detention and training order at Bradford Youth Court....
...The court heard the girl had been drinking with her sister and friends at home before going into Bradford city centre in January last year where she got drunk and needed to go home.
She hailed Mr Ahmed’s cab and was sick six times during the journey. She was so drunk that she couldn’t even say where she lived. Only after a great effort on Mr Ahmed’s part did she get home safely. Once home she dialled 999 and cried rape.