< Islam & The West - Opinions Of A Kashmiri Nomad
Your Ad Here

Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Here is the reason why many western women "fall" for Arab men.





Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Monday, February 26, 2007
Foreign relations and geo-political strategic interests cannot always be run on ethical considerations. Ask the leader of any western nation and he/she will tell you that in the real world western nations have to deal with all sorts of nasty people. They say that necessity is the mother of all invention and in the field of national strategic interest I would hazard to say that necessity is the mother of the most strangest of bed fellows.

Working by the famous Arab saying that "my enemies enemy is my friend" the current American administration has been funding groups that use terrorism as a methodology in Iran in a desire to bring pressure on the current Iranian regime:

"America is secretly funding militant ethnic separatist groups in Iran in an attempt to pile pressure on the Islamic regime to give up its nuclear programme.

In a move that reflects Washington's growing concern with the failure of diplomatic initiatives, CIA officials are understood to be helping opposition militias among the numerous ethnic minority groups clustered in Iran's border regions.

The operations are controversial because they involve dealing with movements that resort to terrorist methods in pursuit of their grievances against the Iranian regime.

In the past year there has been a wave of unrest in ethnic minority border areas of Iran, with bombing and assassination campaigns against soldiers and government officials.

Funding for their separatist causes comes directly from the CIA's classified budget but is now "no great secret", according to one former high-ranking CIA official in Washington who spoke anonymously to The Sunday Telegraph.

His claims were backed by Fred Burton, a former US state department counter-terrorism agent, who said: "The latest attacks inside Iran fall in line with US efforts to supply and train Iran's ethnic minorities to destabilise the Iranian regime." (Source: Daily Telegraph)

Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Sunday, February 25, 2007
One of the hallmarks of a terrorist mindset is the legitimacy of targeting and killing civilians. Most if not all terrorist groups have used this methodology in the conflicts that they have fought. The mere thought that one were to justify the murder of civilians is enough to repulse most human beings.

In recent times terrorism has be associated with Islam and Muslims although this has not always been the case. As is witnessed by the plethora of terrorist organisations since the second world war. Certainly not all of them have been Islamic in orientation and objectives but they all agree on the permissibility of taking civilian lives in their struggles.

This now brings me to the topic of today's post. The University of Maryland's Program on International Public Attitudes conducted a poll in December 2006 asking the question are bombing and other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians ever justified ?

Can you guess the percentage of Americans who thought that bombing and other attacks intentionally aimed at civilians was often or sometimes justified ?

Was it:

(A) 0%
(B) 5%
(C) 10%
(D) 24%

The actual answer is D at 24%. (Source:Kenneth Ballen)

If this poll is an accurate representation of the American nation that means that approximately 71 million believe it justified that attacks intentionally aimed at civilians be mounted.

The blood thirsty nature of some Muslims is put down to following a 7th century Arabian religion that has at its heart the love of murdering the infidel. If this is the case what can be the reason for 71 million Americans wanting innocent civilians to be slaughtered, what could possibly be their motive ?


Technorati Tags:

 

Kashmiri Nomad

Saturday, February 24, 2007
We have looked at the topic of "Eurabia" many a time on this blog previously. "Eurabia" as has been explained before is a pejorative term used by some to denote the near subjugation of Europe by Muslim invaders/immigrants. For more on this subject please click on the links at the end of the post.

Eurabia is a well established tool used by some in the Middle East and North America to induce fear in the general non-Muslim population of those countries that the global Islamic caliphate is just about be established anytime between now and 36 and a half minutes from now. In reality Europe is far from becoming the capital of an Islamic state.

For those that support the notion that Europe is in its last throws of existence before the humiliation of Islamic law is thrown upon it I ask that you give me some explanation to the following story about the European Union and Israelis.

"A full 75 percent of Israelis would like Israel to be part of the European Union, and 11 percent said they would leave Israel if they were granted EU citizenship, according to a new survey.

Half of Israelis visited Europe in the past three years, the study found. The most popular destinations were France, Italy, Britain, Spain and Germany.

Eighty percent of the respondents said they liked Britain, making it the most popular European state among Israelis. Germany placed second with 67 percent support. Germany was followed by Italy, Switzerland, Spain, Turkey and Norway.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel was among the most popular foreign leaders among Israelis: 50 percent of those questioned said they supported Merkel, while a mere 9 percent said they disliked her. 60 percent of Israelis believed Merkel’s election as Germany’s first female chancellor improved Germany’s image in the world; 77 percent of Israelis from the generation that experienced the Holocaust expressed their support for her as well." (Source: Totally Jewish.Com)

If Europe was really about to be overtaken by Shariah law why would some many Israelis want Israel to be a part of the European Union ?

Eurabia, Dhimmitude And Anti-Islam Bigotry

Video: Fox News On Islam And Britain

The Lie Of Eurabia

American Network News And "Eurabia"


Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

July 2006 saw the start of the second Lebanon war in which the world witnessed the Israeli armed forces do battle against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

One of the Israeli war aims consisted of ceasing Hezbollah's ability to launch Katyusha rockets into northern Israel. As a result of the conflict around 1000 Lebanese civilians were killed and around 44 Israeli civilians died in the month long round of hostilities.

At the time of the conflict the Fox News Channel broadcast a discussion of the war on its show "Dayside".

During the transmission the audience is heard laughing when one of the guests describes why Lebanese civilians did not do more to stop Hezbollah launching its rockets into Israel. Another audience member then tries to explain the real reason as to why Lebanese civilians were being killed in the conflict and according to him it had nothing to do with the aerial bombardment:




Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Friday, February 23, 2007
Two American Mathematics Professors have come up with a startling finding for those that thought Muslims only ever had the intellectual abilities of a donkey, the body odour of elephant dung, the appearance of a camel and the blood thirsty nature of a cannibal.

Professors Peter Lu, of Harvard University and Paul Steinhardt of Princeton University say that patterns known as quasicrystal geometry were used in Islamic art from the 1500's. This particular type of geometrical design has only be recently been discovered by western mathematicians.

"Islamic artists were exploiting a mathematical principle to decorate buildings with complicated patterns of tiles more than 500 years before its discovery in the West.

The decorative tilework that adorns some medieval Islamic buildings has been found to use basic geometric shapes that form a complex and highly intricate tiling pattern which does not repeat itself.

...two American mathematicians believe that near-perfect quasicrystal geometry was used by Islamic scholars earlier than the 15th century to decorate the walls of important buildings.

Peter Lu, of Harvard University, and Paul Steinhardt, of Princeton University, said advanced quasicrystal geometry based on 10-sided shapes is seen in the tiling patterns of mosques and madrasas of the Middle East and central Asia, predating its discovery by Western mathematicians by 500 years.

"It could be proof of a major role of mathematics in medieval Islamic art, or it could have been just a way for artisans to construct their art more easily," said Mr Lu. "At the very least it shows us that a culture we often don't credit enough was far more advanced than we thought before."

Lu and Steinhardt show in a study published in the journal Science that by the 13th century Islamic artisans had begun producing patterns using a small set of decorated, polygonal tiles which they call "girih" tiles.

Art historians have until now assumed that the intricate tilework had been created using straight edges and compasses, but the study in Science suggests the Islamic artisans were using a basic toolkit of girih tiles made up of shapes such as the decagon, pentagon, diamond and hexagon.

The scientists found that by 1453, Islamic architects had created overlapping patterns with girih tiles at two sites to produce near-perfect quasicrystalline patterns that did not repeat themselves. "The fact that we can explain so many sets of tiling, from such a wide range of architectural structures throughout the Islamic world with the same set of tiles, makes this an incredibly interesting universal picture," Mr Lu said." (Source: The Independent)

Image: Steven Evans

Technorati Tags:

 

Kashmiri Nomad

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

I recently wrote a post entitled "Why Muslim Migration To The West Must Stop Now!" as a result of that post Isaac Schrödinger wrote a thought provoking rebuttal.

Isaac Schrödinger claims to be a Pakistani born ex-Muslim who is pro-American. He entitled his rebuttal as follows "End Muslim Immigration Because..."I shall now reproduce some of the salient points from his post:

"Muslim migration to the west must stop immediately. The logic behind this stance is amusing

For the sake of argument, let's say what this fellow states is true. Then, why haven't the majority of Westerners simply clamored for ending Muslim immigration? For example, the West could seize taking in Muslim immigrants and increase the numbers of bright non-Muslim Indians and Chinese. That's a pool of 2.5 billion people; so the whole process should be fairly easy.

What has stopped the West from doing exactly that for many decades?" (Source: Isaac Schrödinger)

It seems that Mr.Schrödinger has a rather rose tinted view of the world where all men are as equal as the teeth of a comb. Unfortunately the rest of us have to live in a reality where prejudice and hate exist.

One of the entries on my blogroll has some interesting comments about the face veil debate that has gripped Britain for a number of months now. The latest installment in the drama has come from Lord Nazir Ahmed the first ever Muslim member of the British house of Lords. He contends that the wearing of the niqab (face veil) is a stumbling block to the integration of Muslims into British society:

"The full-face Muslim veil is a "mark of separation" and a barrier to integration with western society, a Muslim member of Britain`s first upper chamber of Parliament said on Tuesday.

In comments likely to rekindle debate on the controversial issue, Lord Nazir Ahmed told a regional newspaper: "The veil is now a mark of separation, segregation and defiance against mainstream British culture.

"But there's nothing in the Koran to say that the wearing of a Niqab is desirable, let alone compulsory. It`s purely cultural. It`s an identity thing which has been misinterpreted.

"They were supposed to be worn so that women wouldn't be harassed. But my argument is that women, and communities as a whole, are now being harassed because they are wearing them."

Ahmed recently spoke in a debate in the Qatari capital Doha supporting a motion that the Niqab was a "barrier to integration in the west," the newspaper reported.

Ahmed said he did not want the Niqab banned but that a "sensible and sensitive" debate was needed about whether they were required in British society." (Source: Zee News)

The following are some of the comments made by Guessedworker over at the Majority Rights weblog regarding Lord Nazir Ahmed and the niqab:

"This is insulting. Alien people with a less than endearing religious culture can’t just decide to “integrate”, and whether their women (and their terrorists) do or do not wear big black tents is completely immaterial. We possess the power of choice, in that we can choose who belongs with us and who doesn’t. The decision with Moslems appears to me to have been taken decades ago, and it isn’t going to change.

I grant that if we were nothing more than the capacious cultural bag of Britishness, into which anything can be stuffed, Rotherham Sahib might have more of a point. But we are not. We are the English. That is, we are genetically of that Northern European sub-set identifiable as English. Britishness is only an elected, political thing, and it is dying fast.

Of course, the other side of the coin is that Rotherham Sahib is genetically Pakistani with all that implies....."

"This sort of behaviour does not and never will belong to us. But if our sense of uniqueness, our understanding of our true national character is rising, so is that of young Moslems. The gap is widening every day and neither Ahmed nor Blair nor Straw nor anyone else is going to close it by attacking the veil.

This is good. We want to balkanise. Everything we can do to increase the understanding of our distinctiveness must be done. " (Source: Majority Rights)

What was that about all "Westerners" wanting Muslims living with them ? I suggest that Mr.
Schrödinger takes another look at the world and this time without the rose tinted glasses.

Image: Agência Brasil

Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Tuesday, February 20, 2007
A Romanian Orthodox Christian priest and four nuns have been convicted of "causing the death" of a fellow nun.

Father Petru Corogeanu was performing an exorcism ritual to relive Maricica Irina Cornici form being possessed by Satan. The ritual ended in the death of the nun and now the imprisonment of the priest and his aides..

"A PRIEST and four nuns have been sentenced to jail for killing another nun in a FIVE-DAY crucifixion.

Irina Cornici was left hanging with no food or water — and had a towel in her mouth.

Father Petru Corogeanu, 30, and his cohorts claimed the 23-year-old was possessed by Satan and her ordeal was an exorcism.

He told a court that Irina had started behaving oddly and the ritual was “quite normal” to tackle her condition.

The priest also blamed MEDICS for her death after they were finally called to the Tanacu Monastery in eastern Romania and battled to bring her round.

He told a court in Vaslui: "My biggest mistake was that I called the ambulance when she was not moving."

Corogeanu was sentenced to 15 years while Sister Nicoleta Arcalianu, 32, got eight.

Sisters Adina Cepreaga, 20, Simona Bardanas, 21, and Elena Otel, 23, were given five years each.

All five had denied illegally detaining a person and causing their death in detention." (Source: The Sun)

"The nun, Maricica Irina Cornici, believed she heard the devil talking to her. She was treated for schizophrenia, but when she relapsed, Daniel Petru Corogeanu -- a monk who served as the priest for the secluded Holy Trinity convent in northeast Romania -- and the four other nuns tried exorcism.

Cornici, 23, was tied up for several days without food or water and chained to a cross. She died of dehydration, exhaustion and suffocation." (Source: CNN)

Image: Petru Corogeanu

Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Sunday, February 18, 2007
A visiting Israeli Professor to Australia has caused a bit of storm with his assertion about Muslims and migration. Such is the seriousness of his comments that even the Jewish organisation that co-sponsored his visit has had to openly rebuke the Professor. This has lead to the accusation that some in the Jewish community have fallen into "Dhimmitude" a pejorative term used to describe non-Muslim subservience to Islamic law.

One wonders what was so "evil" in the ideas of the visiting Professor that even his co-religionists wanted nothing to do with him ?

"THE Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) has withdrawn its support for a visiting Israeli expert on Islam who earlier this week urged Australia to cap its intake of Muslim immigrants.

AIJAC executive director Dr Colin Rubenstein issued a statement on Friday distancing the organisation, which has partly sponsored Hebrew University Professor Raphael Israeli's six-week Australian visit, from the academic's claims that "life will become untenable" unless the Muslim population is kept in check.

Professor Israeli said Australia was in danger of being swamped by Muslims - especially from Indonesia - and called for a "preventative policy" to protect national security and ensure Muslims remained a "marginal minority".

Dr Rubenstein said AIJAC had censured Professor Israeli over the "unacceptable and unhelpful" remarks, and "will not be co-hosting any of his further appearances in Australia".

Professor Israeli had just begun a stint as a scholar-in-residence at the Shalom Institute in Sydney, where he is teaching a course on "Understanding Islam".

Shalom Institute CEO Hilton Immerman said that while Professor Israeli’s views do not necessarily represent those of the Shalom Institute, which "rejects any form of racial stereotyping or ethnic quotas", the course would proceed.

Professor Israeli said radical Islam would not be defeated by a war of words.

“You have to infiltrate all those circles where the Muslim radicals operate, to arrest them, and to limit immigration into western countries where these Muslims, who are bent on destroying western civilisation ... to limit immigration, even students who apply to come from Islamic countries to the West,” he said.

“It serves no purpose when you have this home-grown terrorist, who has been preparing for years to blow up undergrounds in London, and all you do is lead a war of words. The war of words doesn’t help. There is a whole gamut of actions that are possible in order to check this threat of Islam.”

Citing France, where Muslims comprise about nine per cent of the population, as an example, Professor Israeli warned growing Muslim communities could change the political, economic, and cultural fabric of a country.

"You have to adopt some kind of preventative policy. In order not to get there, limit the immigration and therefore you keep them a marginal minority, which will be a nuisance, but cannot pose a threat to the demographic and security aspects of a country."

Officially, there are fewer than 300,000 Muslims in Australia according to the 2001 Census, but Islamic community officials estimate the actual number to be at least 500,000 - about 2.5 per cent of the population.

"Even though it’s so low, they are so vocal, and they make so much noise," Professor Israeli said. "And therefore the situation has to be checked before they increase their numbers, because don’t forget in your immediate proximity dwells the largest or most populous Islamic country in the world [Indonesia], and by necessity, there is demographic pressure from there to channel the surplus of populations to wherever it's possible.

"And one of the big possibilities is Australia, so they will continue to come legally, or illegally, and settle here, and when they get to the rate of the 10 per cent like in France, then you will see life will become untenable.” He said France might already be at the "point of no return".

"Then they control whole sections of the economy, there are areas in France where you cannot be elected to Parliament without the support of the Muslims and so on. And therefore, by increasing their numbers they start to have an impact on the social, economic, political and cultural nature of the country." (Source: Judeoscope)

Looks like he is peddling the same old myth that western civilisation is at the point of extinction and action must be taken now before its too late.

The proponents of this hypothesis expect us to believe that the Muslim world is about to wipe out the west precisely at 4.35 pm next Friday. The reality is somewhat different; a large proportion of the Muslim world lives in abject poverty they are uneducated, technologically inferior and most of them are worried about where their next meal is coming from. The last thing on their minds is the idea of global domination and establishment of the Caliphate.

For my part I agree with the Professor that Muslim migration to the west should be stopped but not for the reasons that he suggests. I believe that most of the populace of the western world do not want a Muslim presence amongst them. For this reason of blind prejudice Muslim migration to the west should be stopped.

Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Saturday, February 17, 2007
There is currently an important debate going on in the Muslim community in Australia.

Some Muslims are calling for mosques in the country to fly the national flag outside their religious establishments. The proposal is aimed at trying to further integrate Muslims into the Australian main stream.

"SENIOR Muslim leaders have called for the Australian flag to be flown outside the nation's mosques as an expression of the Islamic community's "loyalty" and commitment to this country.

Muslim clerics yesterday urged Australia's 300,000 Muslims to back the idea as a symbol of "integration" and pride.

The former chairman of the Prime Minister's Muslim reference group, Ameer Ali, pushed the Australian Muslim community yesterday to adopt the flag.

"Even in Muslim countries in the mosque they fly the national flag ... (such as) in Pakistan. If that can be done in a Muslim country why not in Australia?" Dr Ali said.

Dr Ali said he spearheaded the initiative of displaying the flag outside Muslim schools owned by the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils when he ran that organisation in 2002.

He also ensured that students sang the national anthem during special functions.

"We are Australian Muslims," he said. "And it (the flag) is a symbol of our national identity."

One of Australia's most respected female Muslim leaders, Aziza Abdel-Halim, said displaying a national flag outside mosques would not conflict with Islamic teachings.

"Putting the Australian flag (outside mosques is) a good sign of integration, of being at one with everyone else in this country and our pride in being Australian," said Sister Abdel-Halim, also a former senior member of John Howard's Muslim advisory body.

"I don't see anything at all that would contradict Islamic teachings in any way. It would be a nice gesture to have it, especially now that Muslims really need to underline the fact that they are loyal to this country."

Another respected imam, Amin Hady, said it would be especially important for the Australian flag to be flown outside mosques on special national occasions, such as Anzac Day and Australia Day. "That is to me a good idea to reaffirm the commitment of anyone living in this country, including the Muslims who are part of the population," the Indonesian imam said. " (Source: news.com.au)


Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Friday, February 16, 2007
Here is good ol' Virgil Goode up to what he is best at namely an intellectual analysis of the current state of Iraq, the Middle East and the impending establishment of the gobal Islamic Caliphate in Washington D.C.

By the way Mr.Goode just to correct you from a theological point, it is "in Allah we trust" not Muhammad as you so claimed in your speech. I am sure this is just a syntax error on your part rather than a fundamental lack of understanding.

On very a personal note he looked so clever until he opened his mouth and that awful accent fell out like a maggot infested carcass.




More information on the intellectual and political colossus that is Virgil Goode:

I Am A U.S. Congressman And I Hate Islam


Youtube Video: Voters Response To Virgil Goode


Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Does one have to be Muslim in order to dislike the policies of the current Bush regime ? Of course not.

The following is a case of a British man who has a novel way of showing his dislike for the current American President.

Mark McGowan will dress like George W. Bush and then crawl around Manhattan inviting people to kick him in the ass:

"A BRITISH man is to crawl on his hands and knees round New York wearing a George Bush mask and a sign saying "kick my ass" on his bottom.

Mark McGowan is protesting against the US president and wants Americans to kick him.

The 37-year-old artist will stuff a pillow down his trousers to cushion the hardest blows during the 36-mile three-day crawl through Manhattan.

McGowan said: "People will be able to come and kick me - the President, George Bush - as hard as they like and gain some comfort in the fact that they can say 'I kicked George in the ass'.

"This is a protest against George Bush and I am expecting injuries, I just hope not too severe." (Source: Daily Mirror)

Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Muslim migration to the west must stop immediately.

My personal migration to the west was not one of choice but it has given me the opportunity to experience many things that if I had remained in the homeland of my ancestors I would probably not have experienced. Does this mean that Muslim migration to the west is a good thing ? You decide.

I will now list some of the reasons given for stopping Muslim migration and not having a Muslim presence in the west:

(i) Muslims are blood thirsty they wish to kill every Kafir (infidel)
(ii) Muslims use the freedoms of the west in order to destroy the west.
(iii) Muslims wish to establish the global Caliphate in the west.
(iv) Muslims wish to enslave all non-Muslims.
(v) Muslims wish to bleed the west dry by claiming welfare.
(vii) Muslims are all hooked nosed.
(viii) Muslims all smell of camels.

Out of all the examples above only one fits me personally, can you guess which one it is ?

My reason for wanting to stop Muslim migration to the west is not because of any of the reasons mentioned above. I believe that Muslim migration must be stopped because the majority of population of the western world do not want Muslims in their countries. This has been true in the 1940's, 1950's, 1960's, 1970's, 1980's, 1990's and also in more recent times.

The migration of Muslims to west has never had the support of the populace of these nations. For example there has never been a referendum in the United Kingdom or France asking the British or the French if they wanted Muslims from their former colonies coming to live with them. The reason for this is quiet simple because both the political and mercantile classes of these western nations know that the majority of their populations would never agree to having Muslims live in their midst. Therefore they were never asked.

This state of affairs has resulted in polarised societies being created where all the ills of such societies are blamed on the "outsider". Do not for one moment think that I absolve the Muslim communities in the west from all blame. They are a part of the problem but for a certainty they are not the whole sum of the problem. The political and mercantile classes of the west must accept their share of the responsibility. A responsibility that is predicated on the fact that they never considered the views of "Joe Average" when it came the question of Muslim migration to the west.

Muslims can only be "integrated / assimilated" into western societies when both Muslims want to integrate and non-Muslims want to integrate with them until that time polarisation is the order of the day. All sides must take their fair share of blame.

Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Monday, February 12, 2007
Other parts in the series establishing the truth about the Bible can be found by clicking the links:

Part One:The Biblical Rule For Apostasy.

Part Two:A discussion regarding the book of Numbers chapter 31 verses 13-17 and enlightenment of these verses from the Talmud.

Part Three:The age of Mary when she conceived and gave birth to Jesus.

Part Four:The punishment for rape in the Old Testament.

Part Five: Polygamy in the Bible.

Part Six: Anti-Semitism in the Bible.

Part Seven: Honor killings and the Bible.

Part Eight: Rape, Murder And Slavery the Bible's Message.


In this post we shall have a look at some of the actions that according to the Bible deserve the death penalty.


(i) The Bible commands killing those who touch Mount Sinai:

"And thou shalt set bounds unto the people round about, saying, Take heed to yourselves, that ye go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death:

There shall not an hand touch it, but he shall surely be stoned, or shot through; whether it be beast or man, it shall not live" (Source: Exodus 19: 12,13)

(ii) The Bible commands the killing of the owner of an ox that has killed a human:

"But if the ox were wont to push with his horn in time past, and it hath been testified to his owner, and he hath not kept him in, but that he hath killed a man or a woman; the ox shall be stoned, and his owner also shall be put to death." (Source: Exodus 21:29)

(iii) The Bible commands the killing of cow worshippers:

"Then Moses stood in the gate of the camp, and said, Who is on the LORD's side? let him come unto me. And all the sons of Levi gathered themselves together unto him.

And he said unto them, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp, and slay every man his brother, and every man his companion, and every man his neighbour.

And the children of Levi did according to the word of Moses: and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men." (Source: Exodus 32:26-28)

(iv) The Bible commands the killing of the adulterer and adulteress:

"And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death." (Source: Leviticus 20:10)

(v) The Bible commands the killing of homosexuals:

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." (Source: Leviticus 20:13)


(vi) The Bible commands the killing of anyone who believes in free speech:

"And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death." (Source: Leviticus 24:16)


(vii) The Bible commands the killing of witches :

"Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." (Source: Exodus 22:18)


(viii) The Bible commands the killing of whoever kidnaps :

"And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death." (Source: Exodus 21:16)


(ix) The Bible commands the killing of whoever curses their parents:

"And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death." (Source: Exodus 21:17)

(x) The Bible commands the killing of whoever engages in bestalitiy :

"And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.

And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. (Source: Leviticus 20:15-16)


Technorati Tags:
 

Kashmiri Nomad

Friday, February 09, 2007
The title to this post is a not a record of my sentiments towards the American people it is however the title of a discussion taken from the British newspaper The Sun's website.

The Sun is considered to be by many a right-wing publication and its readership usually supports the alliance between America and Britain. Some "lefties" and Muslims have renamed the British daily "The Scum" for its right wing reporting and views especially concerning Muslims.

In March 2003 as coalition forces were invading Iraq a column of armoured British vehicles were making their way north of Basra in Southern Iraq. Simultaneously the column was being tracked by a couple of A-10 American tank-buster aircraft. The pilots deciding that the tanks represented the enemy proceeded to dive and attacked the British. As a result Lance Corporal Matty Hull was killed. The U.S. military held a board of inquiry and absolved the pilots of any blame for the incident. The U.S. Department of Defense then sent the findings of the report and the video from the cockpit of the A-10 to the Ministry of Defence in London. The British military conducted their own investigation of the incident and the matter was shelved.

As is normal in the United Kingdom when ever a citizen dies in unnatural circumstances an inquest is held and this was also the case for Matty Hull. A coroner's court investigates in order to establish the cause and circumstances of death. The wife of the slain British solider was told by Ministry of Defence officials that no video footage of her husband's death existed. It now transpires that a video does exist and the British could not show the family because of restrictions put on them by the U.S. government. The coroner wanted the tape played in court.

The video tape was leaked to the British newspaper The Sun who then promptly showed the world what happened on that fateful day.

A copy of the video can be seen by clicking the link : Sky News Report on death of Matty Hull

As is the case with these types of things the news media finally found out the name of the American pilot responsible for the incident. A British news team from ITV was dispatched to his neighbourhood and ended up speaking to one of his neighbours. The following report was shown on British television:



The news report above garnered an angry response from Sun readers some of their views are detailed below:

Whitley Boy: After watching the news tonight i could,nt believe what that w---k-r said about the British what a t-ss-r he is i.d love to bump into him what a git, I wonder what he would have said if his son got shot by so called friendly fire, If the yanks could shoot propley that guy would still be here but as usual they can,t find their a--e from there elbow and just shoots at anything that moves and have they ever won a war.

Moorlok: Yes I also saw that ignorant hillbilly american on the news tonight. What an utter thick as pigsh1t, trailer trash, dumb yokel.

Is it any wonder the americans are so universally despised?, though I would think this dip$h1t does not represent the majority, or does he ??.......yikes!!

Herodotus: The guy interviewed was one of the A10 pilot's neighbours, so you know his view is going to be a bit biased, but still...
The comment that got me was "Your country should get it's act together, or it'll be like WW2 when you sat sucking your thumbs".
How charming.
On the late night news report, they showed a longer version of the interview and he came out with this gem - " We don't want your help, we don't need your help, we want your co-operation".
This from a bloke whose crowning acheivment in this conflict is to live next door to a bloke who shot at his allies...

Let's be honest, you get fools like that in every country, but considering that the inquest into the death of the soldier is currently ongoing, he could have spared a thought for his grieving widow.

John2345: I noticed that the idiot who was interviewed was a "Vietnam Vet"....so he'd know all about how good the American forces really are, I guess! As for "we don't need your help.." perhaps he's like to consider how the SAS had to rescue American captives in Afghanistan when their so-called "elite" Delta Force wssn't up to the job....and how they also had to do the fighting in the mountains because their unfit soldiers couldn't handle the thinner air at altitude.

Of course the plonker who actually fired the shots has been promoted and is now training other pilots! Great! As to the idea that he was only obeying Ground Control, how about the clear orange markings on the vehicles? Did it not occur to this highly-trained(?) hero (??!) that he should maybe not just act in automaton mode, but try to think? Or are the US forces just incapable of thinking for themselves?

Thank God for our professional and highly trained forces, we should be proud of them. They should be pulled out of Iraq immediately - and let Idaho see how his heroes get on without them!

Mattj04: I once wanted to live in America then I worked with the US Army for three years, it soon cured me of my desires. The majority are not the sharpest tools in the box.

TJW
: There all ******* they all believe that we are a second rate nation, even though most if there ancestors are made up of many brits etc.

That guy last night made me so mad, i had chest pains! my father fought in the second world war and went back for the Korean....he lost a lot of pals in both, how dare ITV let this **** say what he said, the Americans didn't join the Second world war for ages, what was he on step up and fight that we cant fight our soilders are **** etc, why didn't the reporter say something to him. its all great TV i guess, that pilot isn't a hero he fired without a command! didn't he, or am i wrong he was found gulity and now they are covering it up, if it was one of ours they would want his balls on a plate. **** the USA off they are polluting the world wont do anything about it, they are governed by a moron, they believe they are the better race there all fat ********. why do we bother with these people.....!

Woodyx: I served in the British Army for 10 years, and i have also served alongside American troops. I found them to have no combat discipline, they are prepared to kill anything that moves without first identifying their target.

The American said that we did nothing in two world wars, i would like to ask him what did the Americans do during those two wars. In the first world war thay did not come into it till the last year, in the second world war they refused to enter the war until Japan attacked Pearl Harbour, then they did not wish to enter in Europe as they said it did not concern them as it was a Eurpean war. When they entered the last war the tide for victory had already turned as we defeated the Germans during the battle of Britain.

My eldest son served in the first Iraq war and he informed me that he noticed four military truck approaching the British line and when this convoy was identified they turned out to be Canadian. When asked what they where doing coming from the Iraq lines they said "to get to their o